Intel and ME, and why we should get rid of ME

Re:Intel and ME, and why we should get rid of ME by desdiv on Saturday June 11, 2016 @09:49AM (#11883422)

Off topic: Your ¹²³ thing is really cool. Do you mind if I use it too?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel and ME, and why we should get rid of ME by PeCaN on Saturday June 11, 2016 @11:35AM (#11883798)

Of course not, go for it. On Windows I use https://github.com/SamHocevar/wincompose to type that and a bunch of other useful characters. On FreeBSD and Linux, .XCompose.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel and ME, and why we should get rid of ME by walterbell on Saturday June 11, 2016 @10:04AM (#11883472)

How is that done?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel and ME, and why we should get rid of ME by catnaroek on Saturday June 11, 2016 @10:40AM (#11883595)

In Emacs, this can be done using "C-\ TeX", which enables an input mode that turns ^1 (resp. _1) into a superscript (resp. subscript) 1, and similarly for other digits. (Hacker News' UI is simple enough to be usable in Emacs.) No idea about other environments.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel and ME, and why we should get rid of ME by colejohnson66 on Sunday June 12, 2016 @02:01PM (#11889341)

Unicode superscript numbers

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel and ME, and why we should get rid of ME by mirimir on Wednesday June 15, 2016 @09:20PM (#11913356)

Also see http://text-symbols.com/upside-down/ :)

One of many implementations: http://www.upsidedowntext.com/

[ Parent | on HN ]