Re:It’s cheaper to build multiple native applications than o...
by StefanKarpinski on Thursday June 09, 2016 @04:22PM
(#11872076)
Which is why it's cheaper to build multiple native apps... which was the point of the article.
Re:It’s cheaper to build multiple native applications than o...
by stcredzero on Thursday June 09, 2016 @04:29PM
(#11872122)
You seem to be laboring under the false impression that I'm disagreeing with the article. I'm agreeing with the article. I'm also pointing out that this situation would indicate there's a market opportunity somewhere. (In the words of Jeff Bezos: Your margin is my opportunity.)
Re:It’s cheaper to build multiple native applications than o...
by djsumdog on Thursday June 09, 2016 @05:32PM
(#11872547)
There are a lot of those little frameworks that try and bridge all this together: PhoneGap, Titanium, etc. They're all varying levels of terrible (unless you want to make games, in which case Unity mobile is a pretty solid bet).
So there is a market, people are trying to fill those gaps, and yet none of them seem to be able to bridge the gap in such a way that devs prefer maintaining two or more native apps over one that compiles for multiple devices with a common framework.
So there is a market, but it doesn't look like it's an easy problem to solve.
The market has spoken. Doing those things is hard enough, people can charge lots for it.
That sucks. "Sucks" == suffering. Suffering == opportunity. (Deliberate Yodaism. Actually high market price == market opportunity.)