News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:R Passes SAS in Scholarly Use by blahi on Thursday June 09, 2016 @01:03PM (#11870674)
Have you even looked at statistics? I get the impression you haven't. Pandas has aggregation and that's it. I don't really like to start those language wars, but what the heck. Your precious pandas is actually worse than the R alternatives in every way. It is slower than data.table while having comparable syntax. Dplyr is comparable in speed while having WAY better syntax.

There are no comments on this comment yet.