R Passes SAS in Scholarly Use

Re:R Passes SAS in Scholarly Use by hadley on Thursday June 09, 2016 @10:41AM (#11869656)

I totally buy that argument, but there's probably not a huge overlap in the set of "common tasks" for R and python.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:R Passes SAS in Scholarly Use by baldfat on Thursday June 09, 2016 @01:58PM (#11871096)

Pandas for Python is almost re-imaging of R (Base 0 instead of base 1 UGH) very closely and the "common task" match closely, but I still use R over Python.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:R Passes SAS in Scholarly Use by Houshalter on Thursday June 09, 2016 @03:03PM (#11871533)

Well then all the more reason to use R, if those are the set of tasks you want to do.

[ Parent | on HN ]