Re:Passwords for 32M Twitter accounts may have been hacked a...
by iagooar on Thursday June 09, 2016 @06:34AM
(#11868520)
And don't forget, that every 18 months, the amount of processing power you get for a modest price, doubles.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Passwords for 32M Twitter accounts may have been hacked a...
by marcosdumay on Thursday June 09, 2016 @08:16AM
(#11868850)
Not anymore.
It's hard to get specific numbers about a trend that just changed. But the double every 18 months is now clearly wrong.
We've got a couple of approximately 27 months doubling, but that is past too. My bet is that we won't get a fixed number ever again.
Re:Passwords for 32M Twitter accounts may have been hacked a...
by tracker1 on Thursday June 09, 2016 @05:45PM
(#11872631)
I'm not sure the fastest per core speed for the last 5 years in CPUs is significantly faster.. more cores, more caches for some operations, but not nearly the growth we used to see.
Re:Passwords for 32M Twitter accounts may have been hacked a...
by cm2187 on Thursday June 09, 2016 @07:18PM
(#11873106)
Well, I was surprised by these benchmarks:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/10404/asrock-deskmini-110-mini...
When you compare the skull canyon CPU and the i5 6500:
http://ark.intel.com/compare/93341,88184
The i5 has better specs on pretty much any aspect, but the skull canyon does way better in those benchmarks. I am told the impact is the 128MB eDRAM which acts as a L4 cache.
So maybe that's the way for computers to become much faster, making everything around the CPU go faster. Integrate the RAM and the GPU on the chip. Superfast SSDs. Etc.
Re:Passwords for 32M Twitter accounts may have been hacked a...
by cmdrfred on Thursday June 09, 2016 @08:44AM
(#11868963)
Let's say that were true, so in a year and half you will only have to spend 20 years cracking the passwords? Bcrypt is designed for this exact situation and performs pretty well.