Re:Passwords for 32M Twitter accounts may have been hacked a...
by sintaxi on Thursday June 09, 2016 @03:49AM
(#11868113)
I thought bcrypt was a deliberately slow algorithm so it cant necessarily be brute forced.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Passwords for 32M Twitter accounts may have been hacked a...
by WA on Thursday June 09, 2016 @04:00AM
(#11868145)
But still much faster than an HTTP request to an Auth API that allows only, say, 5 requests per minute.
Re:Passwords for 32M Twitter accounts may have been hacked a...
by Olscore on Thursday June 09, 2016 @04:01AM
(#11868148)
Right, but you would still bypass the rate limiting of the server whether that be login attempts, http requests per second, firewall rules, latency or whatever when checking.
Re:Passwords for 32M Twitter accounts may have been hacked a...
by dogma1138 on Thursday June 09, 2016 @05:36AM
(#11868356)
That's another rate limiting that has nothing to do with the hash strength.
Good password hashing functions have internal rate limits that reduce the likelihood of anyone being able to break the hashes easily because they will be expensive even when fully implemented in hardware.
For how long are they resilient it's another question but bcrypt is pretty good, it's quite slow, and is expensive to implement in ASIC/FPGA.