Re:Computer Vision Research: The deep “depression”
by argonaut on Thursday June 09, 2016 @02:29AM
(#11867883)
Really? My impression is that most new grad students have a superficial understanding of this stuff, which they promptly never use, since they just end-to-end deep learning solutions.
Re:Computer Vision Research: The deep “depression”
by AndrewKemendo on Thursday June 09, 2016 @03:47AM
(#11868105)
I think it depends on the student and researcher. I would agree that most are implementing ANNs to "brute force" around existing fundamental problems - but to me that's as much a solution as doing it another way - I'm not sure it's worth the effort to do it otherwise. Maybe some efficiencies, but I think getting towards are more generalizable ANN based machine vision system outweighs the negatives.
Re:Computer Vision Research: The deep “depression”
by greendestiny on Thursday June 09, 2016 @02:50AM
(#11867947)
Nah it's just the latest hype to deep learn everything with lots of variations. It'll hit it a local maxima soon of what's achievable and then will begin the task of integrating actual computer vision knowledge.
Re:Computer Vision Research: The deep “depression”
by PeterisP on Thursday June 09, 2016 @07:43AM
(#11868726)
Isn't DNN simply the way how we currently implement pattern recognition by statistical learning? I mean, you can do it a bunch of other ways too, but at the moment it seems that e.g. pattern recognition by a convolutional net trained on lots of unlabeled images is a better way that many classic algorithmic approaches to detecting specific patterns/features.
Except they are learning this stuff prior to their graduate work...so I don't know where the author is coming from here. All of our Computer Vision people are very familiar with all of those topics - especially complex geometries and topology.