Re:Bias Against Novelty in Science
by byroniczero on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @06:25PM
(#11866169)
Obligatory mention of Rupert Sheldrake: http://www.sheldrake.org/books-by-rupert-sheldrake/the-scien...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Obligatory mention of pseudoscience in a topic about real science: check. Might as well hail Deepak Chopra as Einstein reincarnated.
Re:Bias Against Novelty in Science
by byroniczero on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @10:55PM
(#11867273)
Obligatory knee-jerk accusation of “pseudoscience” at the mention of Sheldrake: check. It’s a topic about overly conservative attitudes in the scientific community. Thanks for demonstrating that tendency with your insulting comment.
Re:Bias Against Novelty in Science
by mr_overalls on Thursday June 09, 2016 @10:24AM
(#11869548)
Sheldrake's ideas of "morphic resonance" are the worst kind of pseudoscientific garbage. The man literally believes that insulin molecules inherit a collective memory from all insulin molecules that have existed in the past.
He has constructed a New Age world of fantasy based on a fundamentally new type of physical phenomenon that is completely unsupported by physicists.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and he has not delivered such evidence.