News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How We Lost User Engagement After a Redesign by CamperBob2 on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @06:08PM (#11866093)
Back in the 2007-2010 era of websites, somebody mentioned that "ugly" websites work.

One obvious example being Amazon.

As a consumer I will generally go with whoever gives me the most information about whatever I'm doing/learning/buying with the least clicking around. Indulging in the modern "design" trend of giving me 5 million white pixels is not how you sell stuff to me. I'm not looking to buy white pixels, I'm all stocked up on those.

Re:How We Lost User Engagement After a Redesign by Consultant32452 on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @10:04PM (#11867124)
You may find this writeup from an Amazon veteran about how Amazon goes about designing things. It's 100% about accessibility over aesthetics. Ihttps://plus.google.com/+RipRowan/posts/eVeouesvaVX
Re:How We Lost User Engagement After a Redesign by dingaling on Thursday June 09, 2016 @12:56AM (#11867639)
> It's 100% about accessibility over aesthetics.

That surprises me, since when I visit Amazon's UK homepage my fan kicks-in and there's a noticable delay before I can start typing-in the product for which I want to search; all so that they can load an enormous Prime promotion carousel and rows upon rows of 'product suggestions' in which I have never shown any interest. Today it includes pearl ear-rings.

Re:How We Lost User Engagement After a Redesign by aptwebapps on Thursday June 09, 2016 @06:10AM (#11868445)
Things have changed a bit in the five years or so since that was written. I don't think Bezos controls every pixel any more.

OT: I really miss Yegge's writing. I wish he publish more.

Re:How We Lost User Engagement After a Redesign by EpicEng on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @06:29PM (#11866191)
I don't agree with Amazon as an example, but I agree completely re: modern Web design.