News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Firefox 48 Beta, Release, and E10S by kuschku on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @05:03PM (#11865657)
But it isn’t – the amount of open source devs working on FF depends on how many people use FF, and the amount of fulltime devs depends on funding, which depends on the amounts Yahoo or Google pay, which depend on how many users Firefox has.

With no devs, you can’t implement those features or the security easily.

And especially for security you’ll want fulltime employees.

Also, you’ll have to pay more than Google pays their Chrome devs to ensure the people will keep working for you.

Re:Firefox 48 Beta, Release, and E10S by asadotzler on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @06:48PM (#11866308)
We built Firefox 1.0 and shipped it to the world with zero revenue. Open Source is funny like that. Some people work on it because they love it, not because they're being paid.
Re:Firefox 48 Beta, Release, and E10S by kuschku on Thursday June 09, 2016 @12:42PM (#11870537)
Indeed, and one can surely maintain Firefox 1 or 2 easily with a bunch of volunteers.

But maintaining a whole OS with a whole virtualization layer, a whole sandbox system, several supported scripting systems, its own scheduler, its own graphics stack, and support for compatibility with any bug a competing system has?

Modern browser are reaching complexities we’ve only seen in whole operating systems before. You don’t see a bunch of volunteers maintain everything from Linux to KDE at once, it’s hundredthousands of people working in a very different way.

To be able to compete against Google, be able to force them to implement features you pioneer, and force them to avoid implementing other features, to be able to keep up with them and reach better security than them, the current Firefox team is not enough.