News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Firefox 48 Beta, Release, and E10S by kuschku on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @07:54AM (#11861559)
Forking Chrome is useless, Google can just take a bunch more of engineers to work on it, add some features to chrome, and extinguish your project again.

Forking Chrome would be like fighting against Embrace, Extend, Extinguish after you’ve already lost (which we have with Chrome, compared to what KHTML used to be like)

Re:Firefox 48 Beta, Release, and E10S by kelnos on Sunday June 12, 2016 @03:01PM (#11889683)
That's true of any large open source project, whether heavily backed by a company or not. You need both users and developers to make a fork successful.

Regardless, though, there's nothing that says the hypothetical developers of a Chromium fork couldn't devote some time to merging reasonable fixes & new features from upstream.