News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Pantone Is Still Turning Color into Money (2015) by cptskippy on Tuesday June 07, 2016 @12:09PM (#11855413)
I'm sure you've printed things from color printer and noticed the colors didn't look the same as on screen, or from one printer to the next, or held to computer monitors side by side and noticed color differences. As I type this, I'm sitting in front of two identical Dell monitors of the exact same revision and the color temperatures are completely off. They look fine on their own but side by side the colors look off.

For businesses, accurate color reproduction is essential for brand recognition, brand perception, and reputation. IBM's blue and T-Mobile magenta are pretty iconic. It would look pretty silly if you had a meeting with IBM and the business cards you got handed all had a different shade of blue and none of them match the letterhead on the meeting agenda the provided. Or you walked into a T-Mobile store and the magenta on the walls didn't match the placards, the floor, the employee uniforms, nametags, or the sign hanging in the window.

There are color calibration devices, like the color scanner in the paint section at Home Depot, that are used to calibrate monitors, printers, and everything else but they're useless without a reference point to calibrate to. That's where Pantone comes in. Pantone produces a standard catalog of colors that people can reference. Additionally they license the catalog to software and hardware manufacturers for color matching purposes.

When you take a Pantone color swatch and pull out a color, open Photoshop and paint a swatch of that color and print on an Epson Pantone printer and an HP Pantone printer, those prints are going to match the swatch from Pantone.

Pantone sells consistency.

Re:How Pantone Is Still Turning Color into Money (2015) by Bromskloss on Tuesday June 07, 2016 @12:27PM (#11855552)
So far, so good, but it seems to me like many others would be able to manufacture such calibration devices. I mean, the CIE colour space is known to everybody.
Re:How Pantone Is Still Turning Color into Money (2015) by cptskippy on Tuesday June 07, 2016 @12:55PM (#11855795)
The problem with CIE is that there are no constraints to the colorspace at all. It's gamut range is every color imaginable by a person.

All devices have different ranges of color they can reproduce and nothing can produce the full CIE colorspace. Even if we possessed a device with that capability, we lack the ability to describe all possible colors to that device. AdobeRGB and sRGB are subsets of CIE and computer monitor makers struggle to make professional grade monitors that can cover 90%-100% of those gamut ranges.

The Pantone system is constrained further by just being a subset of colors exist within a limited gamut range. Pantone colors are only ones that can be produced by the mixing of, I think, 14 base colors. Their system sets clear limits on the scope of the problem and provides clear and consistent reference points.

Re:How Pantone Is Still Turning Color into Money (2015) by makomk on Tuesday June 07, 2016 @05:30PM (#11858058)
The other problem is that thanks to metamerism, you can only use CIE for colour matching under a single fixed choice of illuminant - samples that appear to be the same CIE colour under (say) tungsten lighting may not be under florescent lighting or daylight.
Re:How Pantone Is Still Turning Color into Money (2015) by cptskippy on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @09:24AM (#11862091)
And through the rabbit hole of color management we climb...