News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:This is not a place of honor by vilhelm_s on Tuesday June 07, 2016 @08:32AM (#11853982)
> even if poisoning people was ethical, how would the poison last 10,000 years?

Leave a fraction of the radioactive unshielded and buried less deeply, to ensure that wannabe grave-robbers die of radiation poisoning before they uncover much of the cache?

Re:This is not a place of honor by vonmoltke on Tuesday June 07, 2016 @08:53AM (#11854099)
Nobody is going to die from radiation poisoning off the 10,000-year water unless they ingest it, and the hot stuff will be too cool in a couple hundred years at most.
Re:This is not a place of honor by JoeAltmaier on Tuesday June 07, 2016 @08:56AM (#11854117)
The entire premise is that this waste is going to be toxic for 10,000 years. So we're not allowed to posit 'cool in a couple hundred years'.
Re:This is not a place of honor by vonmoltke on Tuesday June 07, 2016 @10:12AM (#11854626)
"Toxic for 10,000 years" does not mean "get radiation exposure for standing next to unshielded waste", not does "cool" mean "non-toxic". The ionizing radiation danger of materials is inversely proportional to their half-life. Stuff that requires inches of lead generally has half-lives in the years or tens of years. Stuff with half-lives in the thousands of years can generally be "shielded" by a thick glass jar.
Re:This is not a place of honor by dsfyu404ed on Tuesday June 07, 2016 @11:46AM (#11855260)
This, if something's emitting a lot of energy it won't be doing so for long.