Also, properties set on the prototype will fail propertyIsEnumerable() and also hasOwnProperty(). for..in loops should always be filtered by hasOwnProperty() in any sane code base anyway.
(I tested the TS output for that class in Node 5 and my own browser, and the property did not come up in the loop, so I just don't think this is an issue in reality.)
And all I was saying is that the spouting of "TS is a superset of ES6!" is not that simple, since most usage will be (for now) with the ES5 output, where it isn't compliant in subtle ways that do cause problems/bugs. Nothing more :)
Obviously there's even cases here TS is compliant and Babel is not. Babel will call those bugs instead of spouting their compiler has no compromises like a lot of the comments here try to imply to convince people.
Look at what is the output for the following code:
class Cat { talk() { console.log('meow'); } }
It's something along the lines of:
var Cat = (function () { function Cat() { } Cat.prototype.talk = function () { console.log('meow'); }; return Cat; }());
The methods in that output will be enumerable. They shouldn't be. The reason is (most likely) that the output for non-enumerable class members is TERRIBLE (try the same thing on babel's "Try it out" page), thus why Babel provides loose mode. Still, it's the kind of very subtle things that can bite you in the rear big time.
Then again, if you have good unit tests and move those over too, it won't be a problem I guess :) Also most likely not a problem if you use ES6 as the compile target.