News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Being privacy-aware in 2016 by majewsky on Monday June 06, 2016 @04:13PM (#11849922)
But it's still easily derivable. If someone buys the LinkedIn dataset and finds that your password is "123456linkedin", the next thing he will try is "123456facebook", "123456googlemail" and "123456bankofamerica". It might help against highly automated attacks that don't look at the actual password string, but anything involving a human hacker will be as bad as the same password reused.
Re:Being privacy-aware in 2016 by TheLML on Tuesday June 07, 2016 @08:56AM (#11854118)
Is it likely that someone is actually going to look at your password in a breach that may contain several million accounts? On top of that, if it even gets cracked (if it was stored and encrypted properly in the first place).

If you're really personally targeted, then I agree with you. But for a casual person it's probably an easier thing to convince them of doing this instead of installing a password manager.