Re:Traffic-weary homeowners and Waze are at war
by HillaryBriss on Monday June 06, 2016 @12:46PM
(#11848129)
It was designed for a smaller number of single car drivers than it has today. And it was not designed for quick/cheap expansion.
I guess any system of transportation would feel like torture for commuters if that system is overloaded and operating beyond its reasonable capacity.
Re:Traffic-weary homeowners and Waze are at war
by dsfyu404ed on Monday June 06, 2016 @01:32PM
(#11848546)
So every major city in the US and Europe?
Re:Traffic-weary homeowners and Waze are at war
by HillaryBriss on Monday June 06, 2016 @04:19PM
(#11849970)
Don't know. Haven't visited every major city in the US and Europe.
One data point: As bad as it can be at times, especially on/near The Strip, Las Vegas still seems less congested than LA.
Re:Traffic-weary homeowners and Waze are at war
by shivsta on Monday June 06, 2016 @08:30PM
(#11851569)
Great thing about Vegas is that there's not really any rush hour during the day. Only party-rush-hour at night.
Re:Traffic-weary homeowners and Waze are at war
by beachstartup on Monday June 06, 2016 @12:50PM
(#11848156)
it actually works great with less people. the problem is hitting that threshold requires regulation, which is a political impossibility except for special events.
http://articles.latimes.com/1985-06-07/local/me-16088_1_traf...
as for the 3am traffic, that was probably night time caltrans work, or a drunk driving accident :(
Re:Traffic-weary homeowners and Waze are at war
by gjolund on Monday June 06, 2016 @04:21PM
(#11849986)
So less people driving leads to less traffic, what a surprise.
I think that LA takes pride in its traffic, like some kind of shared struggle.
It is the only city I have lived in that has an implied 30 minute allowance for traffic delays. Everyone understands and you can use the excuse anytime or day of the week.
I've hit gridlock at 3am on the 101 before. The whole city feels like it was designed to be some elaborate torture device for commuters.