News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Being privacy-aware in 2016 by robinhood on Monday June 06, 2016 @12:17PM (#11847886)
> nobody has yet really, really nailed it.

I don't see how you could do better than something like 1Password. What is missing in your opinion?

Re:Being privacy-aware in 2016 by watersb on Monday June 06, 2016 @03:36PM (#11849645)
1Password relies upon a single, strong password for your "vault", which is vulnerable to sniffers and intermittent surveillance.

I don't understand why they don't offer (at least) 2-factor key for the vault.

Also, they support TouchID on iOS devices, very useful. But in the US, at least one case of someone being legally required to unlock via TouchID, whereas offering up a passcode is still debatable.

So at least offer a short PIN-and-TouchID, and support some 2-factor like Googly Authenticator.

They must have at least considered these things. I don't understand any security issues with this. Implementation is work, and perhaps a support hassle for them.

What are the technical reasons?

Re:Being privacy-aware in 2016 by superuser2 on Monday June 06, 2016 @04:05PM (#11849873)
>single, strong password for your "vault"

This is pretty much the nature of password managers. That password is only ever entered locally. If an attacker can grab local keystrokes, it's game over anyway.

>they don't offer (at least) 2-factor key for the vault

Neither TOTP nor any kind of push/SMS token can be used to secure data at rest. These are mechanisms to authenticate to a server. You could have "2 factor" for data at rest by storing part of the key separately, but there'd be nothing dynamic about it; copying the key material once would be sufficient to use it forever.

LastPass offers 2-factor to authenticate to the LastPass website, but your vault is cached encrypted on the client side, and such a cached copy can be opened using only the master password. (IIRC there is an option to disable this, which works by erasing the cached copy at the end of a session. Hardly bulletproof, and precludes having any sort of backup resilient to the failure of LastPass itself).

Re:Being privacy-aware in 2016 by watersb on Monday June 06, 2016 @05:04PM (#11850360)
Thanks. I must think more about this.

I can understand that TOTP cannot be used for encryption.

But the app is asking for authentication. Zero-knowledge proof game might apply. Of course the local app must have the decrypted key in memory.

I wish we could defend against the Evil Maid...

Re:Being privacy-aware in 2016 by superuser2 on Monday June 06, 2016 @05:12PM (#11850433)
One defends against the Evil Maid with physical security techniques. And by doing your own cleaning :).

The app is not asking for authentication, it's asking for encryption. Else an attacker could bypass the app's logic and read its data directly.

Re:Being privacy-aware in 2016 by dave2000 on Monday June 06, 2016 @04:20PM (#11849981)
Open source would be nice. So I can, you know, check it's not dodgy.