News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WAVM: standalone WebAssembly VM prototype by fulafel on Monday June 06, 2016 @12:53AM (#11844737)
Implementation level bugs dominate, not spec bugs.
Re:WAVM: standalone WebAssembly VM prototype by espadrine on Monday June 06, 2016 @03:56AM (#11845265)
In this instance, WASM shares JS' sandbox and security model down to the implementation, so the added risk is extremely limited. The only part that could be dangerous is the parser.
Re:WAVM: standalone WebAssembly VM prototype by fulafel on Monday June 06, 2016 @04:58AM (#11845437)
From WAVM's Github README: "This is a prototype of a simple standalone VM for WebAssembly"

So it doesn't share code with a JS implementation in this case.

Re:WAVM: standalone WebAssembly VM prototype by espadrine on Monday June 06, 2016 @06:38AM (#11845726)
Browsers have their security model. On the other hand, when you install an executable binary or a Node.js program, you don't expect to have the same security model.

This project fits in the latter category. It does not claim that downloaded binaries are protected by a sandbox, and the only security claim it makes is the following weak one: “The generated code should be unable to access any memory outside of the addresses allocated to it”.