Re:Nest’s time at Alphabet
by JshWright on Sunday June 05, 2016 @04:12PM
(#11842874)
My wife recently made two babies in 33 weeks. That's less than half the average time per baby! Granted, they spent a combined total of 62 days in the NICU, but even accounting for that, we're still ahead, I think.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Nest’s time at Alphabet
by stcredzero on Sunday June 05, 2016 @04:27PM
(#11842952)
Congrats! A premature baby in NICU might appear even cuter to many on the internet. The game and app reviewing public is less charitable to premature software, however.
Re:Nest’s time at Alphabet
by Normal_gaussian on Monday June 06, 2016 @01:45AM
(#11844887)
62 days -> 9 weeks
42 weeks overall
4.33 weeks in a month
42 weeks -> just shy of 10 months
I'm not so sure if you are ahead on weeks. But you are ahead on kids! Congratulations and good luck
You can only double count the babies' NICU time if you're looking at the average baby per week. We averaged 0.048 babies per week, as opposed to the baseline 0.025 babies per week.
Well full-term is often given as actually being 37-42 weeks, with the due date estimate being 40 weeks (not 9 months), making 42 weeks a normal(ish) pregnancy duration.
Not that I want to derail the well-wishing!