News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nest’s time at Alphabet by ChuckMcM on Sunday June 05, 2016 @03:59PM (#11842806)
That example from the mythical man month, however to really put it in context, it would be like hiring 9 pregnant women and giving a bonus to the first one to deliver a baby and aborting the other 8. And yes, that is an overreach because aborting a later term baby is a way more serious thing than canceling a project you've worked on for nearly a year. However, projects that were "late to deliver" were de-funded and it was really hard on the project leaders. When it happened I did not see it instilling in those engineers a desire to work harder and faster next time, rather it just made them cynical and bitter.
Re:Nest’s time at Alphabet by bane on Sunday June 05, 2016 @09:12PM (#11844058)
I think importantly, not all approaches requires equal time to achieve. Some approaches might have been more viable in the market if the PMs had simply been given more time to achieve the product rather than just tossing out the first thing to cross the finish line.

It really explains the sloppy state lots of Google products ship in.