News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The State of Mobile XMPP in 2016 by Arathorn on Saturday June 04, 2016 @08:57PM (#11839083)
I'd be surprised if Matrix is obsolete in a few years. The difference between the Matrix and XMPP spec structure is simply that Matrix is a single curated monolithic spec rather than a set of XEPs. So there's only one true standard at any given point, at a given version (unless someone forks it). We've been evolving it quite rapidly so far, adding modules for the various different use cases out there (http://matrix.org/docs/spec/client_server/r0.1.0.html#featur...), and I don't see that rate of evolution slowing down any time soon.

And even if we did go and entirely rearchitect Matrix (e.g. making it entirely P2P, which is certainly a thought experiment we keep in mind), one would just go bridge it into the existing Matrix ecosystem and migrate as desired.

Re:The State of Mobile XMPP in 2016 by emias on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @05:37AM (#11861063)
> We've been evolving it quite rapidly so far, adding modules for the various different use cases out there [...], and I don't see that rate of evolution slowing down any time soon.

> And even if we did go and entirely rearchitect Matrix (e.g. making it entirely P2P, which is certainly a thought experiment we keep in mind), one would just go bridge it into the existing Matrix ecosystem and migrate as desired.

Are you saying you might end up in a situation where "fragmentation of features between clients and servers is common"?