News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Programming Languages as Constraints by nickpsecurity on Friday June 03, 2016 @07:40PM (#11834036)
"COBOL is one of the most used languages in the world, and the number of lines of code is surpassed perhaps only by a handful of languages. That alone tells me any generalisation you make about COBOL programmers is most probably erroneous."

One a name and one phrase changed but it's still technically true. Clearly something wrong with your argument unless you think COBOL is also superior to other languages due to uptake.

Re:Programming Languages as Constraints by golergka on Friday June 03, 2016 @08:02PM (#11834132)
Comment you're replying to didn't say anything about C being superior or not.
Re:Programming Languages as Constraints by nickpsecurity on Friday June 03, 2016 @08:26PM (#11834234)
It implied it had good design or worth vs other languages due to massive uptake vs other languages.
Re:Programming Languages as Constraints by KMag on Friday June 03, 2016 @10:35PM (#11834651)
My reading of the OP was just that there are tons and tons of C programmers, who almost certainly use C for many different reasons, and it's hard to believe any sweeping generalisation of such a large diverse group.... and therefore it's difficult to believe that none of the large and diverse number of C programmers trust anything after K&R.
Re:Programming Languages as Constraints by andrepd on Saturday June 04, 2016 @01:59AM (#11835140)
Yes, that was what I meant to say. Nowhere, of course, did I say anything about C being good or not.
Re:Programming Languages as Constraints by nickpsecurity on Saturday June 04, 2016 @06:00AM (#11835730)
In that case, I take it back.