News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why is a Rust executable large? by Retra on Thursday June 02, 2016 @09:09PM (#11827623)
What do you mean by 'universally adopted?' Available on all platforms? Default linking strategy? All code is dynamically linked?
Re:Why is a Rust executable large? by kbenson on Thursday June 02, 2016 @10:07PM (#11827812)
I'm not sure exactly what was originally meant, I interpreted it as how currently dynamic linking is the norm, is used in every mainstream OS and most the applications run on them, and all the major mobile platforms. If we had to make a choice right now without the history of dynamic linking behind us, would we still choose to use it for the majority of platforms?
Re:Why is a Rust executable large? by yazaddaruvala on Friday June 03, 2016 @01:28AM (#11828513)
FWIW: You appropriately articulated how I meant 'universally adopted'.

Nit:

"Use it for the majority of platforms [and/or for the majority of applications]?"