News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TeamViewer denies hack after PCs hijacked, PayPal account... by cpncrunch on Thursday June 02, 2016 @07:26PM (#11827034)
Yes, I just had a look at paypal's user agreement, and this does seem to be the case. That begs the question - why are the hackers even bothering to do this, if all their transactions will be cancelled? Are they hoping that a small % of their victims won't notice the fraudulent transactions?
Re:TeamViewer denies hack after PCs hijacked, PayPal account... by ryanl0l on Thursday June 02, 2016 @07:31PM (#11827086)
Most paypal fraud, like credit card fraud happens at a very small scale. A fraudster pays $50 for 50 accounts and then spends a day with them and maybe walks out with $300.

The guy selling the accounts sells hundreds of thousands of them, and obviously doesn't get involved in the fraud itself.

This is why this whole thing is so strange, there's a bunch of people claiming that someone hacked teamviewer and is now using that access for petty paypal fraud instead of targetting the tens (if not hundreds) of thousands of PoS systems teamviewer is used to manage.

>Are they hoping that a small % of their victims won't notice the fraudulent transactions?

No, they certainly don't care if the payments get charged back or not. If they try to send money to their own account, it'll be suspended before they can actually withdraw it out of PayPal.

Instead in this case they seem to be trying to buy itunes gift cards, undoubtedly with the intent to sell them (on sites such as g2a.com) before they get cancelled.

Re:TeamViewer denies hack after PCs hijacked, PayPal account... by lsaferite on Friday June 03, 2016 @08:54AM (#11830023)
Perhaps targeting a PoS system involves the Secret Service?
Re:TeamViewer denies hack after PCs hijacked, PayPal account... by ryanlol on Sunday June 05, 2016 @01:31PM (#11842036)
If you're doing this then you probably aren't too worried about the secret service.
Re:TeamViewer denies hack after PCs hijacked, PayPal account... by runamok on Friday June 03, 2016 @11:09AM (#11830753)
Easier to script perhaps?