Re:SQL Server 2016 is generally available today
by jimstr on Wednesday June 01, 2016 @06:05PM
(#11818609)
We made the mistake of buying a 20 core server for running SQL Server 2008, which was fine then, but the upgrade to 2016 would be really expensive due to the new per-core licensing, which means we'll probably be stuck with 2008. Microsoft doesn't leave us much choice than to use Postgres from now on.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SQL Server 2016 is generally available today
by tracker1 on Thursday June 02, 2016 @12:52AM
(#11820449)
Not fun... don't know what the pricing structure is for self-hosted SQL...
I have been considering using either Amazon's Postgres RDS or Azure SQL for a couple of side projects, with the app itself running on Digital Ocean... Kind of leaning towards the Azure SQL option for easier scaling, and a little more hands-off.