News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel knows it's no longer inside by TillE on Wednesday June 01, 2016 @02:23PM (#11816867)
Right, even single CPU performance of mainstream Intel chips has more than doubled in 7 years (Nehalem to Skylake).

Many important things which affect performance have been stagnant for a very long time, especially cache size and RAM latency. But there's been steady progress in raw CPU power, coupled with a significant reduction in TDP.

Re:Intel knows it's no longer inside by gpderetta on Wednesday June 01, 2016 @07:22PM (#11819121)
Do you have a reference for the doubling? How much does the boost from AVX affect the score?

I'm asking because I recently "upgraded" my desktop to a cheap westmere 6 core xeon [1] as in most benchmarks it is competitive with recent i7s.

[1] x5670 @3ghz, but should easily overclock well into the 4ghz range.

Edit: autocorrect

Re:Intel knows it's no longer inside by robocat on Thursday June 02, 2016 @05:31AM (#11821270)
Primatelabs provide benchmarks for: 32 bit 1 CPU, 32 bit threaded, 64 bit 1 CPU, 64 bit threaded.

https://browser.primatelabs.com

Useful information if your workload is single threaded.

Note that their usage of the word browser is nothing to do with www browsers.

Re:Intel knows it's no longer inside by gpderetta on Thursday June 02, 2016 @06:12AM (#11821400)
Oh, Geekbench which can be 'won' by implementing a single encryption instruction in hardware.

Still, even looking at the scores for less broken sub benchmarks, like (possibly) lua and dijkstra show a %50 increase in performance from Westmere to Skylake for the same frequency, which is more than I was expecting. And skylake should potentially clock much higher although I believe the top is currently still 4ghz.

Of course for anything that can take advantage AVX2 (or AVX3 for xeons) skylake would smoke the old xeon.

edit: reword