Where did I mention that my objective was maximizing my influence? The objective is improvement in the society. My influence has nothing to do with it.

The point is, just giving money does not absolve us of our moral responsibility. If I donate with an objective of social good, not just with the idea of dispensing my spare wealth, it is my right and duty to see that my investments give the maximal return, i.e. maximal social good.

Of course I can be wrong/ suboptimal in my investment strategies but then I can improve.

So basically don't donate to the poor?

It's not a donation if it comes with enforced obligations.