News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by alttab on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @11:32PM (#11811894)
Another way to think about this is if a person comes into existence, then BI demands their immediate universal right to the resources to sustain their life comfortably without any contribution from that body.

So really, those who multiply the fastest win the resource war of the future? Or having kids is somehow constrained now through other hoops, like a "procreation license."

Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by rtkwe on Wednesday June 01, 2016 @10:50AM (#11814748)
> Or having kids is somehow constrained now through other hoops, like a "procreation license."

Possibly, though better educated and better off people tend to have fewer children so there are other ways to limit population beyond strict China or Ender's Game style limits.

Or maybe asteroid mining will finally break and crash the whole materials economy making everything but space, food, and water extremely cheap.

Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by alttab on Wednesday June 01, 2016 @09:43PM (#11819785)
My point is this: universal BI requires some level of population control (to prevent poverty and misery), and eventually some level of reproductive planning.

Universal BI leads to universal resource control.

Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by rtkwe on Thursday June 02, 2016 @10:00AM (#11822479)
Really we'll need either population control or (more likely and) to drastically limit consumption (or the impact of it maybe more closed cycle recycling) with or without BI.