News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by jamiequint on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @02:48PM (#11809011)
The thing is that with Basic Income these no longer need to be Government Services, they can be private services if the government just guarantees private organizations opt-in access to a piece of the paycheck prior to its distribution.
Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by morgante on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @03:21PM (#11809327)
That seems ideal.

Essentially, allow people to pre-commit to paying for a specific expense to a private organization which has to provide that service. They can opt out later on, but only before their next basic income check.

Also, I think there should be some sort of auto-enrollment system. So if you're found homeless, having blown all your BI check on booze, you'd be automatically enrolled in the top housing provider.

Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by sounds on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @04:34PM (#11809975)
One question this raises is the frequency of the BI check.

I think many people would need a BI deposit weekly.

Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by morgante on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @04:35PM (#11809984)
I think weekly would probably be ideal.

In a few years, we could even make it daily so it's as close to a continuous stream as possible.

Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by Roboprog on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @05:00PM (#11810193)
How about 3 times a day, while we are at it :-)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riverworld#Grails

Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by zanny on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @04:22PM (#11809880)
"Top" is relative, you can be at least given the choice of provider, but I am absolutely certain in a UBI scenario offering your UBI for simple living provided for you would be a huge industry, and would also account for anyone who cannot manage money like OP says just fine.