News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by Diederich on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @01:55PM (#11808505)
I've not heard of or thought of this approach. It's pretty clever. Still possible to abuse, but it seems at least somewhat less likely.
Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by billmalarky on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @02:01PM (#11808569)
You would need to outlaw "BI payday loans" for this to not be circumvented almost immediately.
Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by sremani on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @02:36PM (#11808890)
Black and Gray markets exist for a reason, and if you ban something, it wont go away, it will just go under ground.
Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by MichaelBurge on Wednesday June 01, 2016 @12:12AM (#11812008)
Actually, you'd only need to classify the money from BI as not being subject to garnishment or collections. This is how Social Security is handled.

With this, they could loan the money to people and people would owe it, but they couldn't collect.

Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by ricardobeat on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @02:11PM (#11808667)
With such small amounts, the fees would be a huge % - no different than loan sharks everyone already has access to.
Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by douglance on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @02:37PM (#11808910)
Not if we use cryptocurrency.
Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by Diederich on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @03:59PM (#11809678)
Can you expand on that?

Note: I'm pretty far on the 'yay cryptocurrency' scale, but I'm just missing what you're saying here.

Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by gedy on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @02:08PM (#11808646)
then "We'll simply unleash wave after wave of Chinese needle snakes."