Re:Liblfds, a portable, license-free, lock-free data structu...
by cyphar on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @06:42PM
(#11810856)
I think making all code free software would allow bad code to be fixed, which would result in a much better state of affairs than having proprietary software that won't ever be made free because the author won't fix it.
And having a top comment on HN warning me that the code is pretty bad saves me time, too, because I don't have to read the code or try using it to find that out. So I really appreciate people publicly pointing out that the code is bad.
I'd feel more positive about this code if it had been submitted with a request for code review and feedback rather than being presented as a "a portable, license-free, lock-free data structure library written in C" with a whole website advertising it as being ready for use.