Sublime Text 3 marked as recommended build

Re:Sublime Text 3 marked as recommended build by tiplus on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @03:32AM (#11805231)

I feel that the comments here are too negative, which ST2/3 does not deserve. ST is still a supreme editor and using/paying for ST is not a bad thing. Wasn't it ST which introduced the cool look&feel and features which Atom and VSCode now adopted? I love the ST ctrl+d select (even if it existed before).

PLUS: ST still has a super quick loading time which makes it a great addition to emacs/vi in some use cases.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sublime Text 3 marked as recommended build by wingerlang on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @03:57AM (#11805319)

> cool look&feel and features

Which ones?

And yes, cmd+d is the best thing since sliced bread.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sublime Text 3 marked as recommended build by threatofrain on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @07:21AM (#11805883)

As a quibble, I would say that Visual Studio Code is unique in its own right, and not for any of its code editing features (which is comparatively lacking). It's a simple editor with a killer code insight feature. I have a feeling other editors will have difficulty replicating this feature.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sublime Text 3 marked as recommended build by daveroberts on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @02:41PM (#11808936)

What is the "code insight" feature? Is it an intellisense feature of VSCode?

[ Parent | on HN ]