Re:Governments Turn to Commercial Spyware to Intimidate Diss...
by arca_vorago on Monday May 30, 2016 @12:46PM
(#11802062)
Hey, I really appreciate the elaboration, and I think I am in agreement with you on this point. I have to admit perhaps it was a bit over the top because I thought you were sarcastically using the pro rights gun statement and somehow trying to apply it to this topic.
Re:Governments Turn to Commercial Spyware to Intimidate Diss...
by alanwatts on Monday May 30, 2016 @12:53PM
(#11802094)
Relying simply on voting and politicians to solve the problem of mass surveillance is just passing the buck.
The problem is more technical than political. It is a problem of internet architecture and design which must be addressed from within by technologists.
Currently, only a handful of ISPs and Internet Gatekeepers (i.e. Google, Facebook) have ultimate control over the majority of information flow.
If all you have to do is tap a few wires at key choke points (i.e. Room 641a) or hack into a server at FB or Google to own billions of users then that is like marching rank and file into machine gun fire on a global scale.
Re:Governments Turn to Commercial Spyware to Intimidate Diss...
by justratsinacoat on Monday May 30, 2016 @12:40PM
(#11802042)
A solid point; would that more people thought like you. One minor grammar-nazi nitpick, though: "populous" is an adjective describing the size of a population; "populace" is a noun describing the population itself.
Let me try again: Spying from government to its citizens should be flatly illegal, and until we demand as much, we are failing our own democratic system and sliding per notch into turnkey totalitarianism.*
*not intended as hyperbole -- we are a long way from it, but the notches are undeniable