News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Not to Explain Success by vintermann on Monday May 30, 2016 @04:10AM (#11800193)
I'm sure giving your kids a good and useful education is one way to transfer wealth between generations. However, it sometimes fails.

Direct ways of transferring wealth between generations never fail. And there's a lot of those going on too.

Transferring values is hard. Transferring cash is easy.

Re:How Not to Explain Success by Donzo on Monday May 30, 2016 @09:26AM (#11801196)
"Direct ways of transferring wealth between generations never fail."

Sure it does.

Plenty of heirs "lose the farm."

It's been said that the first generation builds the business, the second generation manages it, and the third generation loses it.

Maintaining and growing wealth are different than receiving and spending.

Re:How Not to Explain Success by theoh on Monday May 30, 2016 @12:27PM (#11801995)
Re:How Not to Explain Success by vintermann on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @01:58AM (#11804897)
Plenty of heirs "lose the farm."

The transfer still worked. And people who get success more on their own sometimes lose the farm too (more often, I'd bet - I don't think there are any low risk strategies of getting richer than your parents).

Maintaining and growing wealth are different than receiving and spending.

It's much easier than getting it in the first place, though.

Re:How Not to Explain Success by Terr_ on Monday May 30, 2016 @11:50AM (#11801846)
> It's been said that the first generation

Ah, but how diluted does it get with each increasing cohort of heirs?

Re:How Not to Explain Success by js8 on Monday May 30, 2016 @09:18AM (#11801155)
> Transferring cash is easy.

Not always easy. There are disasters too - hyperinflation, nationalization, monetary/land reform, privatization.. any of them can cause you to lose large amount of wealth.

Re:How Not to Explain Success by vintermann on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @01:59AM (#11804900)
All of them hit work-acquired wealth just as hard as inherited wealth.