Re:How big an issue is the nausea problem for VR products?
by kzhahou on Sunday May 29, 2016 @02:59PM
(#11797702)
All the articles on Magic Leap are short of details. All their YouTube clips have had some questionable element. All we have are breathless investors, a couple of reporters, and the due diligence we assume was behind the $500+ million they received.
Until they show something to the public, I'll give them zero credence of having really advanced the state of the art.
Re:How big an issue is the nausea problem for VR products?
by CamperBob2 on Sunday May 29, 2016 @05:49PM
(#11798389)
It's hard to escape the suspicion that Magic Leap is the Theranos of VR.
Re:How big an issue is the nausea problem for VR products?
by fapjacks on Sunday May 29, 2016 @04:58PM
(#11798191)
Haha your comment is priceless against its sibling. You're totally spot on.
Re:How big an issue is the nausea problem for VR products?
by AndrewKemendo on Sunday May 29, 2016 @10:50AM
(#11796537)
I won't talk any more about ML specifics but I would say that you should expect VRD to be the standard within 10 years regardless of what ML does or doesn't release.
Last month's Wired article on Magic Leap says that they've got the magical depth focus problem solved. Unfortunately it's frustratingly short on details. So I don't think we'll know for sure until it's actually released, but if this first generation of Vive/Oculus doesn't solve the issue, whatever generation that Magic Leap ends up being in might.
http://www.wired.com/2016/04/magic-leap-vr/