News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on JVM JIT optimization techniques. Parent comment

Re:JVM JIT optimization techniques by bitmapbrother on Saturday May 28, 2016 @11:52PM (#11794678)
Ah, synthetic benchmarks. Are you really sure they're consistently twice as slow? Your link shows otherwise.

  mandelbrot 17% slower
  fannkuch-redux 34% slower
  fasta 38% slower
  fasta-redux 39% slower
  pidigits 44% slower
So much for predicting my next argument.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:JVM JIT optimization techniques by CherryPickMuch on Sunday May 29, 2016 @12:14AM (#11794740)
How come you left out these ones?

    spectral-norm 115% slower
    reverse-compliment 121% slower
    n-body 136% slower
    regex-dna 235% slower
    k-nucleotide 253% slower
Cherry picking your data shows you're either dishonest or really lost in your denial.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:JVM JIT optimization techniques by bitmapbrother on Sunday May 29, 2016 @01:16AM (#11794917)
Perhaps you should read his reply more carefully next time. He said the benchmarks were "consistently 2x" as slow. He was wrong and the rest of the synthetic benchmarks you posted just corroborated my point.

As for being dishonest, well, you're commenting from a newly minted temp account so it would seem you didn't have the courage/backbone to use your real one.

[ Parent | on HN ]