News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:'NSA addition to ifconfig' by vonklaus on Saturday May 28, 2016 @05:22PM (#11793592)
hahaha i am not 100% sure. However, in terms of starbucks, you could probably respond with, write Abraham Lincoln, on my cup. Thus what you have said is technicaly simply a command but not a claim.
Re:'NSA addition to ifconfig' by nickpsecurity on Saturday May 28, 2016 @05:43PM (#11793679)
"But, Mr Vonklaus, isn't it true that issuing a command that implicitly creates an idenfity itself an act of identification? Or did you expect us to believe they delivered it to Abe Lincoln himself?!"
Re:'NSA addition to ifconfig' by theoh on Sunday May 29, 2016 @05:50PM (#11798391)
The theory of "speech acts" goes into this kind of question. In certain contexts, merely saying something does amount to an action. Marriage vows are a familiar example.