You can spend $200k and master beer pong, or you can spend $200k and learn how to make analytical / computational models of real-world problems. A lot of people split the difference. Either way, you get the same degree, and employers seem unable to differentiate. The university system has already debased the currency, so forgery doesn't bite as keenly.
>If they aren't giving an education and people can still get jobs "for years" what exactly is the point of $200k education again?
Its purpose is more symbolic than realistic. Symbols are easily faked. An example of this is how Frank Abagnale was able to fake having gone to medical, law, and flight school, among many other things.
Re:Making the Grades
by WalterBright on Tuesday May 31, 2016 @06:06PM
(#11810668)
Yeah, but Abagnale never tried to fly an airplane.
Wikipedia says he was sometimes invited by the actual pilot to take the controls. Presumably that was just holding it steady. Apparently, he knew enough to switch it to autopilot.
He also didn't do a very good job as a doctor (supervising the residents doing the actual work). Wikipedia mentions that a baby nearly died because he didn't understand what the nurse was talking about.
Higher Education in America is largely chicanery like noble titles before the French Revolution: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11756804
This quote says more to me about the companies hiring them and about degrees from any university than it does about NPU.
If they aren't giving an education and people can still get jobs "for years" what exactly is the point of $200k education again?