Obvious reading comprehention failure is obvious.

DanBC didn't write anything which could imply he believes that "If you want privacy, you must be a child molester or a terrist".

"Try sending an image of child sexual abuse through your gmail account and see what happens." - the implication is clear: "why else would you fear the Big Brother?"

No, the implication is - do that for a practical demonstration that Google does the same thing 'kuschku pointed out Microsoft does.

I presume the purpose of that sentence is to back up the previous one ("Everybody does this").

I think you need to reread DanBCs comment.

His comment is stating what google does and gives a pretty strong example, not justifying what they do.

That's not what I meant. How could I make my comment more clear?

What I meant is that almost all companies will invade privacy to prevent and detect certain crimes. MS does it, but so do Google, Apple, etc etc.

Okay, I apologize for having misread you. Thanks for a level-headed clarification to my angry comment.