News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Cellphone-Cancer Link Found in Government Study.

Re:Cellphone-Cancer Link Found in Government Study by franky303 on Friday May 27, 2016 @04:43AM (#11784698)
Well ... 900 MHz. GSM. CDMA. - Sounds like outdated to me. What about what we are using daily e.g. 2.6 GHz LTE and 3G signals.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cellphone-Cancer Link Found in Government Study by agumonkey on Friday May 27, 2016 @07:46AM (#11785327)
What about wifi ? Since I, we, are sitting next to routers all day long, which I guess are sending more EMW energy through us than 3G towers.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cellphone-Cancer Link Found in Government Study by maxerickson on Friday May 27, 2016 @08:54AM (#11785660)
The exposure from towers and base stations will be tiny compared to the exposure from devices. Inverse square law and all that.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cellphone-Cancer Link Found in Government Study by Gnarl on Saturday May 28, 2016 @09:46AM (#11791635)
With regard to cell-towers: the inverse-square law will underestimate your radiation exposure from a cell-tower, because they are directional and the inv.sq.law relates only to to perfectly isotropic radiators. In other words: you need to factor the cell-tower antenna gain (typically between 7-10dB) into your calculation.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cellphone-Cancer Link Found in Government Study by agumonkey on Friday May 27, 2016 @09:43AM (#11785949)
That was my assumption too but I never tested it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cellphone-Cancer Link Found in Government Study by Sephr on Friday May 27, 2016 @08:35AM (#11785573)
700-900 MHz is used for LTE as well, and is usually preferred due to its building penetration characteristics.
[ Parent | on HN ]