News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Sensible Fix For TSA Security Lines by rayiner on Thursday May 26, 2016 @01:56PM (#11780079)
Also, hijackings and airplane bombings were common before modern security protocols (in the late 1960's and 1970's): http://listverse.com/2012/10/27/top-10-us-airline-hijackings... http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/30/world/middleeast/airline-h... ("By the mid-1970s, at least 150 planes had been “skyjacked” in the United States alone[.]"); http://99percentinvisible.org/app/uploads/2014/06/Successful... (FAA chart showing dramatic reduction in hijackings after introduction of airport screening in 1973).
Re:A Sensible Fix For TSA Security Lines by educar on Thursday May 26, 2016 @02:33PM (#11780385)
Sure, they were common but the media wasn't as prevalent. For example, I know of none of those before 2000s. But post-2000 I know of every single hijack and plane crashed because the internet and media shoved it on my face because it's always on every website. I bet that if there is a hijacking tomorrow, it will in HN front page (even though it's a tech website). That's how much these things multiply. Whereas, a bus crash or some other bombing will never make it to HN web page.
Re:A Sensible Fix For TSA Security Lines by rayiner on Thursday May 26, 2016 @02:59PM (#11780585)
Doesn't your point cut the other way? I.e. if we got rid of all airline security and went back to the days of a dozen airline hijackings a year, wouldn't the pervasiveness of the media make the impact much worse than it was in the 1970s?
Re:A Sensible Fix For TSA Security Lines by rhino369 on Thursday May 26, 2016 @02:11PM (#11780205)
And even if you totally secure a cockpit, they hijackers could always take hostages from among the passengers.
Re:A Sensible Fix For TSA Security Lines by Johnny555 on Thursday May 26, 2016 @02:21PM (#11780294)
Sure, but the pilot isn't going to hand over control of the plane or fly it into a building no matter how many hostages are taken or what the hijackers do to them.