News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Squid, octopus, and cuttlefish populations have been risi... by Houshalter on Thursday May 26, 2016 @11:27AM (#11778650)
Where do you think animal feed comes from? It takes the times more farmland to raise a cow vs making bread.
Re:Squid, octopus, and cuttlefish populations have been risi... by shanev on Thursday May 26, 2016 @03:22PM (#11780744)
Not all meat is the same. A slice of deli bologna isn't the same as a cut of pasture-raised sirloin. One comes from a factory that requires animal feed and antibiotics, the other comes from a farm that only needs sunlight, rain, and grass.
Re:Squid, octopus, and cuttlefish populations have been risi... by Houshalter on Thursday May 26, 2016 @04:59PM (#11781553)
The argument was that it destroys habitats. "Pasture raised" animals are still taking up vastly more land per calorie produced, than regular farmland. In fact they take up even more than regular factory farm, because the factory farm is optimized towards efficiency and corn is more economically efficient feed than grass. There isn't enough pastures in the world to feed everyone pasture raised meat.
Re:Squid, octopus, and cuttlefish populations have been risi... by shanev on Thursday May 26, 2016 @06:19PM (#11782145)
This is not true at all. The majority of the land mass on Earth is grassland. At least it used to be. What are now cornfields in North America used to be plains full of bison that fed on grass. We can re-create a similar ecosystem using high-yielding methods popularized by modern grass-fed operations like Polyface Farms, and management techniques like rotational grazing.
Re:Squid, octopus, and cuttlefish populations have been risi... by Houshalter on Thursday May 26, 2016 @08:56PM (#11783098)
A grassy plain supports many fewer animals than the equivalent corn field. Otherwise there would be no economic incentive to grow corn instead of raising livestock on the same land. So you would need much more land to support the same amount of animals, land we just don't have.

Prior to Europeans arriving, it's estimated there were 60 million wild buffalo in the US. There are now 93 million cows in the US. And those cows are much fatter. Bred to produce more meat, grow faster. So consume much more food (and produce more per unit), so the comparison is even worse than that.

Re:Squid, octopus, and cuttlefish populations have been risi... by nitrogen on Thursday May 26, 2016 @01:24PM (#11779788)
How much protein do you get from bread, though? A calorie is not a calorie.
Re:Squid, octopus, and cuttlefish populations have been risi... by delecti on Thursday May 26, 2016 @01:51PM (#11780040)
From 100 g of soybeans you get 36 g of protein, vs 30 g of protein from 100 g of beef.

Barring strange niche medical concerns that don't affect the vast majority of the population, humans can live healthily without any meat products.

Whether or not you personally choose to is not my concern, but the root of your argument doesn't really hold water.

Re:Squid, octopus, and cuttlefish populations have been risi... by shanev on Thursday May 26, 2016 @03:10PM (#11780657)
Yes, but farming soybeans destroys land and is dependent on pesticides and chemicals from companies like Monsanto. Pasture-raised grass-fed beef instead revitalizes land, provides natural fertilizer for plant growth, and sequesters carbon from the atmosphere to combat climate change. Not all meat is the same.
Re:Squid, octopus, and cuttlefish populations have been risi... by delecti on Thursday May 26, 2016 @04:01PM (#11781024)
The majority of beef raised in the US is raised on corn and soybeans.
Re:Squid, octopus, and cuttlefish populations have been risi... by shanev on Thursday May 26, 2016 @05:37PM (#11781865)
Right. This needs to change.
Re:Squid, octopus, and cuttlefish populations have been risi... by delecti on Thursday May 26, 2016 @11:26PM (#11783701)
I actually agree entirely, but factory farm meat will continue to be cheaper so long as corn subsidies are so high, and those aren't going anywhere any time soon. Which means that for the time being, meat consumption is the less environmentally friendly option.