Then you don't know what the word "dogma" means.
What I said was "In my experience." i.e. practice learned over time.
This cannot be interpreted by any reasonable person as "blobs are bad, just 'cause."
That kind of straw man argument leads me to conclude that similar issues are being your inability to understand the use of reproducability.
You aren't offering any evidence or justification besides the statement. I might as well say, "in my experience, ``reproducability (sic) is a waste of time''" -- what's the point of that?
Instead, I'm providing concrete examples of why it's a waste of time, and rather than anyone arguing the contrary, they're doing exactly what you're doing: Repeating that there's some point of "reproducability" (sic). There isn't, you're wrong. End of.
But whatever, my background isn't physics, so what could I possibly know? Running engineering teams for the last two decades that have to develop and deal with high volume, high uptime application servers only means my systems have to work and make money, not that they be "reproducable" (sic).
If you put your hand in a fire 5 times and it burns you 5 times, you don't have to understand anything about fire to know that you should probably stop putting your hand in. And if you saw other people about to put their hand in, you would mention to them that everytime you put your hand in, you end up regretting it.
We don't need religion to keep from getting burned when we have tools.
And yet you don't know why.
This is called dogma, and dogma is bad: It leads people to make stupid decisions over and over, all the while repeating that the alternative is worse.