News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Verdigris: Qt without moc by kbenson on Wednesday May 25, 2016 @03:50PM (#11772556)
While the OP shouldn't have used "venemous", calling it FUD, and then calling the target of the insult the "best" in some respect with nothing to back it up is only slightly better from the perspective use useful conversation. How about explaining your rationale behind why LGPL is the best solution and addressing the more rational concerns brought up, so we can move this conversation past the "No, mine is better!" stage?
Re:Verdigris: Qt without moc by jdright on Wednesday May 25, 2016 @04:17PM (#11772723)
Because there are other places to discuss this than this thread.
Re:Verdigris: Qt without moc by kbenson on Wednesday May 25, 2016 @05:40PM (#11773357)
Sure, there are always other places to discuss something, but that doesn't mean this isn't a good place. Some of the best discussions I've seen or been part of here have been tangential to the original post, as discussions drift. I think the bar here is heavily weighted towards useful, instead of relevant, and relevance is almost always debatable.

To be clear, I don't think anyone minds a civil discussion on the LGPL vs BSD licenses, as long as it's also factual. I wouldn't.

Re:Verdigris: Qt without moc by gaze on Wednesday May 25, 2016 @08:38PM (#11774328)
FUD! It's a fine place.