Re:Scaling to 100M: MySQL Is a Better NoSQL
by jbergens on Wednesday May 25, 2016 @03:39AM
(#11768237)
I think you loose flexibility with sql. If the usage changes slightly and you need to index one or two more fields you would have to do an alter table and read through 200 GB of data deserializing all blobs to put the values into the new field. A good nosql would just add a secondary index.
You might also have a hard time doing map-reduce on sql. It is often built into nosql systems.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.