The Tor Project: Building the Next Generation of Onion Services

Re:The Tor Project: Building the Next Generation of Onion Se... by venomsnake on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @11:39AM (#11762430)

Since NSA core mission is being ahead of everyone else, a claim that capabilities have increased a lot in the last few years is not FUD.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Tor Project: Building the Next Generation of Onion Se... by dimino on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @01:31PM (#11763604)

Without any specific evidence, it's still FUD.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Tor Project: Building the Next Generation of Onion Se... by detaro on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @05:52PM (#11765838)

What would specific evidence for "we don't know how much progress they have made since the last time we had concrete data about them" look like?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Tor Project: Building the Next Generation of Onion Se... by dimino on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @06:13PM (#11765961)

The FUD is implying they've made significant progress. You're right, "we don't know" isn't really a falsifiable statement, in this context.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Tor Project: Building the Next Generation of Onion Se... by Trill-I-Am on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @04:54PM (#11765383)

Is there a certain time period after which we can say it's not FUD? Like if we go 10 years without any additional clarification after the Snowden slides, is it still automatically FUD?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Tor Project: Building the Next Generation of Onion Se... by dimino on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @05:28PM (#11765637)

I'm confused -- are you asking when an unsubstantiated claim is not FUD?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Tor Project: Building the Next Generation of Onion Se... by Trill-I-Am on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @10:57PM (#11767386)

Not all educated guesses and reasoned estimations are FUD

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Tor Project: Building the Next Generation of Onion Se... by dimino on Wednesday May 25, 2016 @02:42PM (#11772082)

None are, actually.

[ Parent | on HN ]