News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Overcome Existing Barriers... by mrfusion on Monday May 23, 2016 @07:35AM (#11753170)
Why not do an elliptical orbit that takes you close enough to the sun to burn up? That seems like less energy than dropping to zero no?
Re:Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Overcome Existing Barriers... by wiredfool on Monday May 23, 2016 @09:38AM (#11753734)
You'd still need an Earth-Sun transfer orbit, which is still a lot of deltaV.

http://i.imgur.com/SqdzxzF.png

Re:Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Overcome Existing Barriers... by lmm on Monday May 23, 2016 @08:48AM (#11753494)
Close to the sun still takes more energy than leaving the solar system, similar to how it's just as hard to charge a capacitor to -9V as to 9V. And in what sense would it "burn up"?
Re:Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Overcome Existing Barriers... by kazagistar on Monday May 23, 2016 @08:50AM (#11753506)
Bring it up does not change the fact that there is now radioactive material on an orbit which still potential overlaps the earth. Out of the solar system is a much better solution.
Re:Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Overcome Existing Barriers... by Symmetry on Monday May 23, 2016 @10:31AM (#11754061)
On the other hand it's not like the Sun isn't spewing out way more radioactive material continuously than we're talking about adding here.

EDIT: To give some orders of magnitude, the back of the envelope tells me that the sun inflicts about 700 TBq of carbon-14 on us every year. For comparison, countries like the USSR and UK have dumped 85,000 TBq of radioactive waste into the ocean (and Fukushima added another 15,000). I don't know how to judge how much of the vaporized waste would end up back on Earth so it's quite possible I'm wrong in the above.

Re:Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Overcome Existing Barriers... by adwn on Monday May 23, 2016 @07:58AM (#11753263)
An elliptical orbit that gets close to the sun is nearly the same as an orbit that goes through the sun.

Besides, exposing radioactive materials to heat does not affect their radioactivity.

Re:Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Overcome Existing Barriers... by msandford on Monday May 23, 2016 @09:06AM (#11753572)
That's only true up to a point. I suspect that if you exposed just about anything to 100,000 kelvin it ceased to look like any kind of matter we know anything about.
Re:Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Overcome Existing Barriers... by mikeash on Monday May 23, 2016 @10:37AM (#11754101)
This experiment was performed thousands of times back in the 1950s and 1960s. A nuclear weapon's fireball is way hotter than 100,000K, and the exploding weapon contains lots of fissionable material and fission byproducts. The extreme temperatures don't destroy them, they just help spread it around.
Re:Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Overcome Existing Barriers... by msandford on Monday May 23, 2016 @02:09PM (#11755650)
Yup, you got me there. Speculating wildly ends poorly.
Re:Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Overcome Existing Barriers... by adwn on Monday May 23, 2016 @10:31AM (#11754057)
> I suspect that if you exposed just about anything to 100,000 kelvin it ceased to look like any kind of matter we know anything about.

1e5 K? You're missing a couple orders of magnitude, there.

The hottest parts of the Sun's surface go up to 20 million Kelvin, and that doesn't "cease to look like any kind of matter we know anything about".

Re:Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Overcome Existing Barriers... by msandford on Monday May 23, 2016 @02:10PM (#11755657)
Yes, but there is SOME temperature at which heating things up does start to cause things to act weirdly. You know, like in a fusion reactor. That definitely changes the radioactivity of certain elements.