Moving Away from Python 2

Re:Moving Away from Python 2 by devishard on Saturday May 21, 2016 @12:42PM (#11745263)

That's totally a question I'd ask, and I don't understand why you don't like it. The reason I'd ask it is not because it's a simple task, it's because it's not a simple task: what I'm looking for is that you aren't going to over-confident-ly throw naive solutions at hard problems. That will cause bugs and have to be cleaned up.

I think if you showed me an implementation that hinted at some of the complexity lurking in the task, that would be a big point in your favor.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Moving Away from Python 2 by mark-r on Sunday May 22, 2016 @12:21AM (#11747360)

I think it depends on the interviewer and the purpose of asking the question. For a phone screen I'd expect it to be a variant of FizzBuzz, designed to weed out the people that aren't worth wasting time on. Coming up with a complex solution, when the interviewer was looking for something simple, is probably grounds for a fail - even if the complexity is justified.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Moving Away from Python 2 by ubernostrum on Sunday May 22, 2016 @01:14AM (#11747435)

Yeah, a lot of places use it as an initial phone-screen "can you code" question.

I did bust out a version on one call which did detection of combining classes, normalized into composed form before checking the reverse, etc., and the interviewer seemed kinda lost as I explained it.

Ended up not working for them, but for different reasons.

[ Parent | on HN ]