Re:House tells NASA to start planning two Europa missions
by riffraff on Saturday May 21, 2016 @04:40AM
(#11743822)
these companies make money when nasa sends stuff into space. If more stuff goes into space, they make more money.
(the money comes out of the government's pocket in this case)
Re:House tells NASA to start planning two Europa missions
by gallonofmilk on Saturday May 21, 2016 @05:39AM
(#11743993)
I'm not sure why this is a big deal especially when it has such scientistific value
Re:House tells NASA to start planning two Europa missions
by ap22213 on Saturday May 21, 2016 @09:16AM
(#11744569)
To me, it's an issue of political deception. Corruption is one of the prime factors in political decay, and history shows that there's nothing good about political decay.
In the US, people are becoming increasingly tolerant of corruption. These days it more often invokes funny euphemisms than action. Politicians have innate incentive to fall into corruption, and it's expected that some of them do from time to time. But, it's the people's job to keep them in check.
If this country values funding science, then it should let the scientists determine where and how the money should be spent, not politicians, not lobbies.
Re:House tells NASA to start planning two Europa missions
by eightysix_four on Saturday May 21, 2016 @05:49AM
(#11744027)
The are two different models for judging someone's actions. Intent and outcome. OP is judging that his intent is bad even if the outcome is good - sometimes that is important to remember.
I can hardly believe Lockheed with Boeing investing into research over life in space research.