Re:Fox 'uses' a gameplay video from YouTube, and removes the...
by pnevares on Friday May 20, 2016 @11:39AM
(#11738708)
I never even considered the second interpretation, which now seems even more appropriate than the first.
I only hope the original author is aware and supportive of the meta-sentiment of the re-upload/re-whitemark response.
Though I never quite understood which interpretation was intended:
* Creator shows their work to someone, who goes on claiming it's their own work.
* Someone shows "their work" to the original creator, who then realizes it's actually their work.